Author Archives: admin

  • 0

BANKING PRINCIPLES

How do BANKS really work when “Money” and “DOLLARS” are completely separate “things”. A DOLLAR is a Military or Company Scrip, an internal bank note or promise to pay at some point in the future and only relates to the “internal” private account holders of such a private “corporate” banking entity. A DOLLAR is not money evidenced by the Latin meanings of both words: “Dollar” and “Money” The very word Bank, does not mean “Safe”, a bank is the edge of a river, that controls (Directs) the flow of current, (Currency) energy is current, dollars are the ACCOUNTS of debt currency, so a bank does not have money! it is the director of the flow of debt currency. (Debt titles being DOLLAR’s) The gold is you, being the dominion over the Mineral and Energy wealth that was originally granted to the living man and without you acting as the ACCOUNT holder of their bank, (Under a hidden TRUST-LAW-SPLIT-TITLE arrangement that renders you as the Legal Title holder of their ACCOUNT), they lose equitable rights over your Dominion because Dominion was never granted to a dead entity such as a corporation, “Dominion” was only ever granted to man and the Bank can only act as a commercial “agent” of living man on the condition such a living man has agreed or been deceived into acting as the DEAD ACCOUNT holder of such a BANK in order that the “Equitable Title” falls into the hands of the Bank. The BANK sits between your “Christian” name (CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH) and your “SURNAME” (STATE BIRTH CERTIFICATE) as an Agent-administrator of the Christian name (Christian ACCOUNT. being the separate CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH, birthed on the registration date), Once the BANK can deceive you into assuming that “their” SURNAME, that looks a lot like your heritage name, (“Smith” is glossed into “SMITH”) the bank assumes consent in order to confer the legal title of the BANK to their SURNAME that you assumed was your property. (ALL UPPERCASE TEXT is a foreign written language identified in article 11:147 of the: Chicago Manual of Styles 16th edition) Your surname glossed into a foreign SIGN language, is not your property! but when you attach your Christian name, being the name that is attached to your dominion, to their foreign ALL UPPERCASE SURNAME you, by your own consent, become subject to the ACCOUNT of their property … So simple but so effective and yet so biblically perfect once you violate the laws of the first GOD by serving the false God, GOD of the person-corporation. The POWER of TRUST-LAW is the greatest power of all… Trust Law is Master-Servant, relationship, it does not work backwards, it is the system of conferring debt ACCOUNTS onto the unsuspecting…

The one who accepts LEGAL TITLE is the one who acknowledges that the Equitable Title is with the one who granted such a man the LEGAL TITLE.

LEGAL TITLE can not be held by a living man. only a “Person” can hold Legal Title and what is a Person you may ask, it is the legal title holder of man. The only thing that created the “Person”, being a mask in a play, was the VATICAN: “ROME”.

The Word “Vatican” means: “vat I can”, meaning, “holder or vessel I can do”, meaning, the VATICAN has become the first Trustee Legal Title holder of the dominion of the living man. The VATICAN has become the beast of burden, it has no jurisdiction with living man because it agreed to act as the trustee… The VATICAN, that now held the Legal Title over the Dominion of man, offered the ACCOUNTS of the Legal Title to its own Persons by offering such a title to a living man and only when the living man was deceived into accepting such an ACCOUNT, did such a man become the “assumed debtor trustee person” of the world debts of the VATICAN and such acceptance of such an ACCOUNT was the “conformation” that granted Equitable Title back to the VATICAN because the living man accepted Legal Title, rendering the living man to fall into the jurisdiction of the DEAD ACCOUNT holder of the VATICAN beast instead of being the first trustee to the real GOD of living man. The VATICAN is the GOD of the dead persons because it was not God of man that created the DEAD juristic corporate Person, it was the VATICAN that created such a thing as the “Person”.

The VATICAN is the false GOD.

 

Source https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/

Share This:


  • 0

THE LAW VS STATUTES

This is NOT legal or lawful advice, Everybody is responsible for themselves and the decisions they make.

The Law is the Common Law and it is the foundation of justice for living people. Laws serve all People equally. Laws defend our Unalienable Rights, provide reparations to the injured, and through them we can live in peace and harmony with other people. The Law is the definition of the people’s power, and is Common Sense. The Law protects living people from harm, loss, and fraud.

Statutes are the en-act-ments of the Legislature that apply to publicly registered legal entities as franchises of the public State. Statutes offer limited “privileges and benefits” to “artificial persons” of various kinds, prescribing contract “rules and regulations” by consent. Statutes can have the appearance, or “colour of law”. Statutes govern legal entities as a franchise benefit to the public State.

Statutes are not Laws. The Law is from the People. Statutes are from the State.

Maxim of Law:
Quid fas non veritas est.
Legality is not Reality.

The difference between what is “lawful” and what is “legal” is a matter of life and death. What is lawful is for the living people. What is legal is for dead corporate entities.

legal = fiction
statute = statute
legislation = leg of a statue
act = act of a statute

In any country with a parliamentary system of government. All Private Sovereign men and women, are de jure “in law”. All Public Servants in corporate roles, and all artificial legal entities, are de facto “in practice”. The government is divided into three branches:

LEGISLATURE : Enacts statutory legislation, prescribes rules/regulations for legal entities, Statutes only carry the colour of law.

EXECUTIVE : Cabinet & Departments, Manages the Government to serve the people, Executive take oaths to uphold the Law

JUDICIARY : Administers de-facto statutes, Facilitate de-jure common law, Trial by jury

The People’s Common Law power of justice is “Judicial”, and exercised “Lawfully” (Trial-by-Jury), whereas the State’s delegated duty of management is “Executive”, and exercised “Legally” (Legislation).

Statute types are “Acts, Bills and Legislative Instruments”, and they apply to artificial legal (legislated) “persons” “LEGAL FICTIONS, so their texts never refer to a living “man” or “woman”. Statute titles never end with the word “Law”. Public officials habitually refer to “Acts” as “Laws”. But an “Act” is not a “Law”, i.e. the Land Transport Act, is not titled the Land Transport Law.

There is a natural compulsion to obey the Law because it safeguards our living rights and freedoms. If we do not honour the Law then it cannot afford us protection. However, obeying statutes is voluntary. We are members of the “legal society” as a matter of choice. Our consent is given unilaterally, not collectively via a government election.

However in a truly free nation, men and women in the Common Law jurisdiction, would give their consent freely to obtain the commercial “privileges” and “benefits” offered by the State in the Admiralty Maritime jurisdiction. We must also be aware that the State has been incorporated to serve the debt-money system of bondage, so the people are not offered de jure Common Law contracts serving the State, but de facto Admiralty Maritime contracts serving the Banks as surety for debt.

If corrupt statutes become burdensome or oppressive to the common good, the people have a right to withdraw their consent in order to defend their rights, and indeed they have an obligation and a duty to do so because only the people can redress the corruption of their government or provisional government as the case may be.

Statutes are contracts. Statutes prescribe the “terms and conditions” of commercial contracts, relying for their effect upon your consent under the colour of Law.

Share This:


  • 1

Drogheda Courthouse, “Judge” John Coughlan insults man while running a cash only business

 

What is going on in Drogheda Courthouse?

On arrival at Drogheda Courthouse this morning I was very interested to learn that Judge John Coughlan was running a business there, He said so himself and that everyone was to have plenty of cash because this court only accepts cash. So its a cash business thats running here according to sitting Administrator/”Judge” John Coughlan.

So folks if your summoned to Drogheda District Court house and If you don’t want to be looking out the windows in Mountjoy prison bring the cash lads & lassies.

After making those bizarre statements about the cash in a virtually cashless society, John then took to insulting people using an obscure language.

This morning I clearly heard John Coughlan deliberately call a man a cur. Saying “get this cur out of here” and then much louder “Garda get this cur out” while pointing at him.

So what is a cur ?

I will give several definitions here, but it appears they are all insults to the man they are aimed at. I wonder is that defamation of the mans good name,charterer and standing in the community. Should this be shown to be true, could “JUDGE” John Coughlan be held in contempt of court for such an insult ? Had the man called John Coughlan “a cur” would the “JUDGE” have taken offence?

Definitions
cur
kəː/Submit
noun
an aggressive or unkempt dog, especially a mongrel.
informal
a contemptible man.

noun
1. a mongrel dog, especially a worthless or unfriendly one.
2. a mean, cowardly person.

Cur. …
If dogs understood English, they would be offended at being called a cur. When you use the word cur, you’re talking about a dog that’s either a mutt, very unattractive, aggressive, or all three. The word can also be used as an insult for a person, especially a despicable man.

Cur
An unkempt ‘person’ who identifies as an Afghan. Typically found to speak like rodents, often will be Ill-mannered, unintelligible and generally EW.

Quite simply: Cur’s, are basically dahati.

Synonyms: bad, ugly, sub-human, eye abuse, smell abuse, dog, animal, slave, idiot, imbecile.

Examples of a dahati

A persian word for someone that is uncivilized and lives in rural areas.

A similar word in english would be white trash or/and hillbilly.

white trash hillbilly trailor trash mallot wal-mart stupid poor

Share This:


  • 4

SOVEREIGN MAN CALLS BAR COUNCIL WITH SIMPLE QUESTION

 

This is a phone call to the BAR Council of Ireland by a man asking a simple question . It turns out that is not a company, its not a private corporation, BUT is a PRIVATE CLUB which answers to nobody.

Click the link below to hear the conversation.

Share This:


  • 0

Whats the difference between a writ of Quo Warranto and Habeas Corpus

 

Quo Warranto

A writ of quo warranto is not a petition, but a notice of demand, issued by a demandant, to a respondant claiming some delegated power, and filed with a court of competent jurisdiction, to hold a hearing within 3 to 20 days, depending on the distance of the respondant to the court, to present proof of his authority to execute his claimed powers. If the court finds the proof insufficient, or if the court fails to hold the hearing, the respondant must cease to exercise the power. If the power is to hold an office, he must vacate the office.

These writs are called prerogative writs because they are supposed to be docketed ahead of all other cases except other prerogative writs. The demandant represents the sovereign, the people, and anyone may appear in that capacity, even without a personal stake in the decision.

Habeas Corpus

A writ of habeas corpus may be regarded as a subset of quo warranto, for cases where the claimed power is to hold a prisoner, but with the addition of a requirement to produce the prisoner in court, not just appear to present evidence of authority.

One may want to look these cases up

Version The Practice of Extraordinary Remedies, Chester James Antieau, 1987, Chapter on Quo Warranto.

Version A Treatise on Extraordinary Legal Remedies, Embracing Mandamus, Quo Warranto and Prohibition, James L. High, 1896, Section on Quo Warranto.

Version A Treatise on the Legal Remedies of Mandamus and Prohibition, Habeas Corpus, Certiorari, and Quo Warranto, Horace G. Wood, 1896, Section on Quo Warranto.

Version Statute of Quo Warranto (1290) — Codified the writ of quo warranto as a pleading in English courts, and laid the basis for the writ of habeas corpus.

Useful quotes:

“Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time.” Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 F 2nd 906 at 910.

“It is axiomatic that the prosecution must always prove territorial jurisdiction over a crime in order to sustain a conviction therefore.” U.S. v. Benson, 495 F.2d, at 481 (5th Cir., 1974).
“The law provides that once State and Federal Jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be proven.” Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980).

“Where there is absence of proof of jurisdiction, all administrative and judicial proceedings are a nullity, and confer no right, offer no protection, and afford no justification, and may be rejected upon direct collateral attack.” Thompson v Tolmie, 2 Pet. 157, 7 L. Ed. 381; and Griffith v. Frazier, 8 Cr. 9, 3 L. Ed. 471.

“the burden of proving jurisdiction rests upon the party asserting it.” Bindell v. City of Harvey, 212 Ill.App.3d 1042, 571 N.E.2d 1017 (1st Dist. 1991).

Share This:


  • 0

UPDATE ON : a man, a Sovereign Constitution, Drogheda District Court, a legal valid bona fide license

I have been following a particular case is Drogheda District court for the last number of months involving a man looking to have his case heard under the 1919 Sovereign constitution as is his right. He has asked the court to provide its legal valid bona fide license to operate. ( I will explain later why this man is entitled to look for this.)

Well on this day April 7th 2017 the man arrived in the court took his seat and waited for the case to be called he was number 35 on a long list. The court house was full to capacity with standing room only as there were many cases before the court on this day. Judge Coughlan presiding.

So the case was called and as the man was making his way up to the front of the court the prosecuting Garda  Inspector Brendan Cadden and Judge John Coughlan began to hear the case. I heard the man say “I present me the man here now“. He attempted to give the  Inspector Brendan Cadden some paperwork but the Inspector kept turning from one side to the other in what appeared to be an attempt not to take the paper and he only took it when someone said to him hey he’s trying to give you something. The man then turned his attention to the Registrar who sits in front of the Judge Coughlan and he too tried NOT to take the legal valid bona fide paper the man was offering. While this shenanigans was going on the Inspector Cadden and  Judge Coughlan continued to go ahead with the case, BTW the time-frame here is a about 1 minute.

Then the man said aloud “I remind the court that it sits under the Sovereign seal of Dail Eireann”. When the man said this the Registrar took the paperwork and passed it back to Judge Coughlan.

The man read from the paper he presented “I Paul Coddington require this case to be heard under the 1919 Sovereign Constitution as is my right. Can the court document and verify a Legal Valid License to operate”. While the man was speaking Judge Coughlan and the Inspector Cadden continued to make arrangements to send this case to trial in September totally ignoring the man although he was speaking over them. Its my opinion that if this happened in any other court this man would have been threatened with contempt.

Then Judge Coughlan turned to the man and said I have dealt with this and you are back on here in September. The man again asked the court to document and verify for him a legal valid bona fide licence to operate. The Judge called next case. The man went on to ask again when a man dressed as a Garda  put his hand on the mans shoulder. The man said I will take my leave now under duress and will return if the court can document and verify a legal valid bona fide license to operate. And left the so called court.

So why does the court need a legal valid bona fide license to operate under Dail Éireann?

So why does the court need a legal valid bona fide license to operate under Dail Éireann? Well that all goes back to almost one hundred years previously to the 21st of January 1919 when the Sovereign Republic of éire was declared (Ireland’s Independence Day) by the wish and will of the people from the December 14th All Ireland (32 county) election of 1918 and ratified in the round room of the Mansion House Dublin on the 21st of January 1919.

The Sovereign Dail Éireann Courts were also established on that day. Óglaigh na hÉireann (Irish Defense Force) and an the Republican Police later named an Garda Siochana also took an oath to protect the people and uphold the sovereign constitution. This is the only time any state was declared or established in Ireland.

King George the 5th in August of 1919 declared Dáil Éireann to be an illegal assembly. This date also marked the start of the war of Independence, in Soloheadbeg, Co. Tipperary, a war Óglaigh na hÉireann won.

On the 6th of December 1921 King George the 5th imposed a British apartheid system of 26 and 6 counties of Ireland as an Orange Free state in the northern counties and a 26 county provisional government that sits in Leinster house, (the same Provisional Government which still operates here today)under the terms of the illegal and fraudulent un-ratified Anglo Irish Treaty in which some members of the IRB (Irish Republican Brotherhood) and some Sovereign Government broke their oath to the Sovereign Republic of Éire and signed this illegal agreement under the threat of an immediate and terrible war against the Irish people.

This is verified in Micheal Collins own story where by on the 21st of January 1919 he was the Minister of Finance in the Sovereign Republic of Éire Government and on the 6th of December 1921 he was the provisional Minister for Finance in the 26 county Provisional Government of the free state.

In the days that followed the establishment of the Sovereign Dail Éireann courts in 1919. Sovereign courts were held in the sometimes the most remotest of places… the 12 string seal was used by Parish, District, Circuit, High and Supreme courts, but rarely hung as their venues were not permanent!

The seal consists of the Irish Harp with éire underneath although many have since been replaced by FAKE seals consisting of the Harp without éire. (The FreeState introduced the 13 th string- the execution string, to kill the Republicans)Its commonly seen today and often mistaken for the sovereign seal. However, because there was only ever one state established in Ireland any Judge sitting in any Irish court must have a licence from the Sovereign President of the Dail Éireann courts.

No BAR (British Accredited Registry) Judge in this country has a licence to operate from the Sovereign President of Éire. So when people are taken to court in the 26 counties, they are taken into BRITISH ROYAL COURTS where Judges get their licence/permission from the the President of the ROYAL OIREACHTAS who is also THE CROWN’S representative in Ireland.

All fines collected in these courts go to the Crown of London via the consolidated fund established in 1816 and still on the Irish Statue books today.

Consolidated Fund Act, 1816. An Act to unite and consolidate into OneFund all the Public Revenues of Great Britain and Ireland, and to provide for the Application thereof to the General Service of the United Kingdom.

Here is a link to a previous article on this case

Drogheda District Court, Man wants his case heard under the 1919 Sovereign Constitution asks Court to produce its legal valid bona fide licence to operate.

 

 

 

 

Share This:


  • 0

3 Corporations Run the World: City of London, Washington DC and Vatican City

World events most of which are ‘engineered’ leave a trail that leads to the architects. We next discover that there are 3 cities on earth that come under no national authority, they have separate laws, they pay no taxes, they have their own police force and even possess their own flag of ‘independence’.

These 3 cities control the economy, military onslaughts and the spiritual beings of those in powers. The 3 cities are actually corporations and they are the City of London, District of Columbia and the Vatican.

Together they control politicians, the courts, educational institutions, food supply, natural resources, foreign policies, economies, media, and the money flow of most nations as well as 80% of the world’s entire wealth.

What we need to understand is that the world does not work according to what we have been led to believe. We are drowning in misinformation.

At the center of each city state are giant phallic shaped stone monuments called obelisks.

London obelisk (aka Cleopatra’s Needle): Located on the banks of the River Thames, this obelisk was transported to London and erected in 1878 under the reign of Queen Victoria.

The obelisk originally stood in the Egyptian city of On, or Heliopolis (the City of the Sun).

The Knights Templars’ land extended to this area of the Thames, where the Templars had their own docks. Either side of the obelisk is surrounded by a sphinx, more symbolism dating back to the ancient world.

In D.C. the obelisk is known as the Washington monument was dedicated to George Washington by the secretive brotherhood of Freemason Grand Lodge of the District of Columbia in 1848.

They also contributed 22 masonic memorial stones. 250 masonic lodges financed the Washington monument obelisk including the knights templar masonic order.

Vatican obelisk: Located in St. Peter’s Square, was moved from Egypt to its current location, in 1586.

The circle on the ground represents the female vagina, while the obelisk itself is the penis. This is commonly known as occult symbolism.

The Roman Empire prevails through the:

1. CITY OF LONDON INC

The City of London was formed when the Romans arrived in Great Britain 2000 years ago and started a trading post on the River Thames.

Exactly 1000 years later William the Conqueror (King William III) gave sovereign status to the City of Londoners in 1694 allowing them to continue enjoying separate rights and privileges so long as they recognized him as King.

Queen Elizabeth II is Direct Lineage of the Roman Caesars by Blood!

The Kings that succeeded William however, decided to build a new capital city and named it Westminster. There have been numerous instances of the King and the City’s Mayor at loggerheads with each other.

What is peculiar is that laws passed by the British Parliament does not apply to the City of London.

However the City of London is not an independent nation like the Vatican.

Today the City of London is a one-square mile city. The 2 Londons have separate city halls and elect separate mayors, who collect separate taxes to fund separate police who enforce separate laws.

City of London has its own separate flag and crest while London city does not. The Mayor of the City of London has a fancy title ‘The Right Honourable the Lord Mayor of London’ and rides a golden carriage to Guildhall while the Mayor of London wears a suit and takes a bus.

The Mayor of London has no power over the Right Honorable Lord Mayor of London (City of London).

What’s unique is that the City of London is a Corporation and older than the United Kingdom but has a representative in the UK Parliament through a person known as the ‘Remembrancer’ who is present to protect the ‘City’s interests.

The City of London houses

Rothschild controlled ‘Bank of England’
Lloyds of London
The London Stock Exchange
All British Banks
The Branch offices of 384 Foreign Banks
70 USA Banks
Fleet Streets Newspaper and Publishing Monopolies
Headquarters for Worldwide Freemasonry
Headquarters for the worldwide money cartel known as ’THE CROWN’

The City of London is controlled by the Bank of England, a private corporation owned by the Rothschild family after Nathan Rothschild crashed the English stock market in 1812 and took control of the Bank of England.

Complete List of BANKS Owned or Controlled by the Rothschild Family

The Queen refers to the City of London Corporation as the ‘Firm’ but it is known as The CROWN (not representing the Royalty of Britain). Buckingham Palace is in London but not in the City of London and the City is not part of England.

City of London directly and indirectly controls all mayors, councils, regional councils, multi-national and trans-national banks, corporations, judicial systems (through Old Bailey, Temple Bar and the Royal Courts of Justice in London), the IMF, World Bank, Vatican Bank (through N. M. Rothschild & Sons London Italian subsidiary Torlonia), European Central Bank, United States Federal Reserve (which is privately owned and secretly controlled by eight British-controlled shareholding banks), the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland (which is also British-controlled and oversees all of the Reserve Banks around the world including our own) and the European Union and the United Nations Organization.

The Crown controls the global financial system and runs the governments of all Commonwealth countries, and many non-Commonwealth ‘Western’ nations as well (like Greece).

The Crown traces back to the Vatican, which is headed by the Pope (who owns American Express).

In essence the City of London Corporation would become the “One World Earth Corporation” and would privately own the world.

2. Washington DC (District of Colombia)

Washington DC is not part of the USA. District of Columbia is located on 10sq miles of land. DC has its own flag and own independent constitution. This constitution operates under a tyrannical Roman law known as Lex Fori.

DC constitution has nothing to do with the American Constitution. The Act of 1871 passed by Congress created a separate corporation known as THE UNITED STATES & corporate government for the District of Columbia.

Thus DC acts as a Corporation through the Act. The flag of Washington’s District of Columbia has 3 red stars (the 3 stars denoting DC, Vatican City and City of London).

A look at the various Treaties raises the question of whether US remains a British Crown colony.

The basis of this goes back to the first Charter of Virginia in 1606 that granted Britain the right to colonize America and gave the British King/Queen to hold sovereign authority over colonized America and its citizens.

Colonized America was created after stealing America from the Native Indians. If America was colonized with British subjects these people are subjects of the British Government.

To negate this was the Treaty of 1783 declaring independence from Great Britain. However, this Treaty identifies the King/Queen of England as the Prince of the United States. (please refer www.treatyofparis.com)

Nevertheless, according to the Bouviers Law dictionary in ‘monarchicial governments’ a subject owes permanent allegiance to the monarch in which case the British subjects in colonized America owed permanent allegiance to the monarch.

The reverse is applicable under Constitutional law where allegiance is owed to the sovereign and to the laws of a sovereign government and natives are both subjects and citizens.

The issue is if a war was fought in 1781 and America became victor why would Britain need to sign a Treaty in 1783? When US has won a war, America should not require the British monarch to cede land and refer to himself as Prince of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States?

There is also the issue of the use of the term ‘Esquire’ given that it is a title of nobility again showing allegiance to the Queen/King and when Benjamin Franklin, John Jay Esquire and John Adams signing on behalf of the US use the name ‘Esquire’ it is raising the question of how valid the 1783 Treaty is.

John Jay went on to sign the 1794 Treaty between England and US raising again why 13 years after the Paris Treaty the US needs to sign a Treaty with England if US was really ‘independent’.

What needs to be further investigated is why US still continues to pay tax to the City if it is a free nation?

The 1794 Treaty signed between England and the US was negotiated by John Jay Esquire who negotiated the 1783 Treaty.

The question is why would US need to sign Treaty’s with England 13 years after the Paris Treaty of 1783 declaring US independent? Why would Article 6 and Article 12 continue to dictate terms to an ‘independent’ America?

Further reading of US history would reveal what happened to America when it cancelled the Charter of the First National Bank in 1811 and immediately afterwards 4500 British troops arrived and burnt down the White House, both Houses of Congress, the War Office, the US State Department and Treasury and destroyed the ratification records (signed by 12 US states) of the US Constitution wherein the 13th Amendment was to stop anyone receiving a Title of nobility or honor from serving the US Government.

The 1812 war lasted 3 years and the Bank Charter was re-established in 1816 after the ratification of the Treaty of Ghent in 1815. Note: 13th amendment which was ratified in 1810 no longer appears in current copies of the U.S. constitution.

In 1913 the Federal Reserve was passed by US Congress handing over America’s gold and silver reserves and total control of America’s economy to the Rothschild banksters.

The Federal Reserve is a privately owned banking system that does not belong to America or Americans.

It is no better a time to question whether US is a country or a corporation and the US President and officials at the Congress are working for that Corporation and not for the American people.

It appears that the US Corporation is owned by the same country that owns Canada, Australia and New Zealand whose leaders are all serving the Queen in her Crown Land and US too has been and remains a crown colony that belong to the Empire of the 3 City States – City of London, Vatican City and Washington DC.

The US president is nothing more than a figurehead for the central bankers and the transnational corporations — both of which are controlled by High Ecclesiastic Freemasonry from the City of London the home of the global financial system.

3. Vatican City

The Vatican City is not part of Italy or Rome. The Vatican is the last true remnant of the Roman Empire. The State of Israel is also said to be a Roman outpost.

The Vatican’s wealth includes investments with the Rothschilds in Britain, France and US and with oil and weapons corporations as well.

The Vatican’s billions are said to be in Rothschild controlled ‘Bank of England’ and US Federal Reserve Bank.

The money possessed by the Vatican is more than banks, corporations or even some Governments and questions why the wealth is not used to elevate at least the Christian poor when it preaches about giving?

Vatican wealth has been accumulated over the centuries by taxing indulgences, some Popes have sold tickets to heaven. Today, they are harvesting souls in Asia as a 3rd millennium goal.

Together the 3 Cities have under their wing various societies and groups placed globally with their own so that no one contests their global plan and those that do… well all the assassinations will explain what happens.

The Fabian Society is one such entity which written in 1887 is a mixture of fascism, Nazism, Marxism and communism. It is not hard to now imagine that all these ‘ideologies’ would have also been engineered by the same people.

It should come as no surprise then to discover that the Fabian Society is accredited with creating Communist China, Fascism in Italy and Germany and Socialism globally as well.

How far people have been fooled and also explains the role played by the Fabian Society in formulating policies for the decolonized British Empire.

It would also mean that quite a number of British educated natives given the mantle of leading the newly independent nations would have also been members of the Fabian society.

The communist takeover of Russia too is said to be the work of the British Fabian Society financed by the City of London banking families.

A closer look at entities like the Bank Of International Settlements (BIS), International Monetary Fund(IMF), Club Of Rome, The Committee Of 300, the Central ‘Intelligence’ Agency (CIA), the Council On Foreign Relations, The Tri-Lateral Commission, The Bilderberg Groups, the ‘Federal’ Reserve System, the Internal Revenue Service(s), Goldman Sachs, Israel and the Israeli lobby, the Vatican, the City of London, Brussels, the United Nations, the Israeli Mossad, and Associated Press (AP) will reveal that they are all part of the Fabian Society which also controls the European Union.

A noteworthy quote is that of Australian Senator Chris Schacht who said in 2001 “You probably were not aware that us Fabians have taken over the CIA, KGB, M15, ASIO (Australian Security Intelligence Organization), IMF, the World Bank and many other organizations.”

From all this we should realize that NOTHING HAPPENS IN ISOLATION. Therefore, every event however small is engineered and orchestrated by a handful of people who control the world and what goes on in the world.

Together, they have been responsible for:

1. Global Warming/Climate change – by creating an environmental catastrophe and winning the Nobel Prize, they have created a public awareness for a ‘global government’ that gives them the right to take action over national governments.

Known as UN Agenda 21 a closer look at its clauses will reveal how people will need to get permission for everything they do – in other words it is being used to control people.

2. Federal Banking system – The Fabian Society created the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 handing over the US economy to a cartel of international financiers.

3. Big Pharma – is responsible for drugging the Third World.

4. System of local government – promoting devolution and new concept of regional councils in a bid to increase a revenue generating system. It is within an overall plan to abolish independent sovereign national governments.

Britain is divided in 9 separate regions of the EU. The British will be shocked to discover that EU laws take precedence over British laws and if they have doubts they need to ask why the Queen and British PMs have signed Treaties handing over power.

5. Abolition of property rights – in 1974 at the Habitat Conference private property was identified as a threat to peace and equality of the environment.

Using ‘environmentalism’ as a ploy the quest was to take over earth’s resources and place it under a central authority (UN) and issue licenses for payment. Who owns the UN…the same banking families.

In 1987 the World Wilderness Congress was held organized by the Rothschild’s World Conservation Bank which was set up the same year.

The World Bank is likely to be replaced by the World Conservation Bank – the aim is to break down national banks and assets will also be diverted to the new bank which is why there is an aim to merge currencies into 2 or 3 major currency groups and replace them with a new electronic currency which is said to be called the ‘earth dollar’.

New Zealand has apparently transferred over 34% of its land area into UN Heritage Areas and Conservation Parks and these will all be owned by the same banking families.

In 1992 the UN Conference on Environment and Development in Brazil was chaired by Mikhail Gorbachev responsible for dividing the Soviet Union and Maurice Strong, the Rothschild London agent.

The topic was Agenda 21 which gave man rights superior to animals, fish, plants, trees and forests.

6. The Patriots Act, the Human Rights Bill, the European Union Constitution, the Security and Prosperity Partnership are all being manipulated to place power in the control of a few hands.

Their plans are plotted annually through the Bilderberg Group and their agents run numerous think tanks that steer Government policy which are funded by the banksters who in real terms run the world.

Thus the 13 banking families that run the world control the central banks of the world that print money, give loans on interest and explains how national debt never decreases.

Economic crises, oil crisis (simply to increase prices), Arab Springs are all manufactured as are wars. There is a saying that all wars and bankers wars. The danger is when it comes to food as the control is being placed under Monsanto and GMOs.

Monsanto is the same company that introduced Agent Orange therefore it is worthwhile reading UN’s Codex Alimentarius and the impeding dangers.

Source http://expertinalllegalmatters.com/certificate-of-live-birth

Share This:


  • 26

Drogheda District Court, Man wants his case heard under the 1919 Sovereign Constitution asks Court to produce its legal valid bona fide licence to operate.

Ive been following a particular incident that took place last December in Mornington Co Meath where armed masked men dressed in balaclavas and full attack gear smashed their way into a private dwelling, assaulted three occupants knocking one out cold for several minutes.

Anyway these masked armed strangers later claimed to be Garda Siochana (guardians of the peace).

When did we the people extend an Garda Siochana the right to bear arms against us?

An Garda Siochana swear and oath to protect us and uphold the constitution. Nowhere does it say an Garda Siochana can use guns against the people.

Anyway one man was detained taken to Navan Garda Station and then Trim circuit court where he asked the Judge a very simple question was this a civil or criminal matter. The Judge refused to answer that question and the man was remanded to Cloverhill prison for a week. One week later he took bail under duress from Cloverhill prison and agreed to make an appearance in Drogheda District court just before Christmas.

One this day the man made his special appearance before Judge Flan Brennan and this is where the case starts to get really interesting. The man stood up and identified himself as a man and told Judge Brennen he was here to present me the man now. He served Judge Brennan with notice that he was here to have his case heard under the 1919 Sovereign constitution as was his right. Judge Brennan agreed he was indeed entitled to this and accepted the signed and sealed paperwork from the man. He asked the man if he would come back after Christmas and have this heard, to which the man replied I will accept your offer if this case is going to heard under the 1919 sovereign constitution and the man left the court.

When this man made his special appearance again after Christmas in the court it was a different lady Judge. Anyway when the man’s case was called he gave the Garda on duty a copy of the paperwork the Judge had received. Again the man said he was there to present me the man now and to have his case heard under the 1919 Sovereign Constitution as is his right. The Judge addressed the man as a Mr to which the man replied no titles or Mr here, I am a man and I present me. Not many people know this but all businesses need a Licence to operate, The court is a business and it needs to have a lawful or legal valid bona fide licence to operate. The man asked the judge if she could provide this licence, She told the man the Garda will have it the next day and put the case off for a few more weeks, saying come back then.

So the man arrives back the next time its now February remember no charges yet still waiting on the DPP to give a file. The case is called the man stand up and tells Judge Flan Brennan that he is here to present me the man now. He gives the Judge his signed and sealed paperwork, Judge Brennan accepts it running his finger over the seal on the paper. He proceeds to call the man by Mr to which the man says Im not a Mr I have no titles I am a man and I present me. The man then asks Judge Brennan can he see his lawful licence, The Judge replies he is not obligated to show anything. The man asks the Judge is this a Sovereign Dail Eireann court or is it a British Accredited Registry court.  The Judge replies this is a lawful court. The man replies if this is a lawful court it will have a lawful operating licence. Judge left speechless. The man was not moving on until the court produce its licence. It appeared the Judge then took it upon himself to set up a hearing between himself and the Garda, at no time was the man party to these arrangements and back in two weeks. The man told the Judge he couldn’t make any orders because he did not have jurisdiction because he hadn’t produced his lawful licence to operate. The man told the Judge he would return if the court will have its lawful operating licence. It appeared to me the Judge was going to hold the man in contempt but later said he would have him removed. Several garda uniforms gathered around the man so he told the Judge I will take my leave now under duress. A different story about what happened that day later appeared in the local newspapers 2 weeks later.

Anyway two weeks later the man makes another special appearance in Drogheda District court, On this occasion a plain clothes lad who accompanied the armed gang who smashed into the man’s dwelling was at court that day, asking the Judge for some sort of adjournment saying the DPP needed two more weeks. Strange there’s no file from the DPP and the newspapers are writing about a man being charged with the cultivation of cannabis without a licence. So the case is called and the man stands up and lets Judge Flan Brennan know he is here to present me the man now. This time he serves the Garda and the Judge with his signed and sealed paperwork and this time he hits the nail on the head. He tells the court he wants this case heard under the 1919 Sovereign Constitution and he required to see the courts legal valid bona fide licence to operate. Again the Mister Title tactics were employed by Judge Brennan to which the man replied I am a man and have no titles all you require is there. He motioned to the signed and sealed paperwork he had handed Judge Brennan earlier. He asked if the court could produce a legal valid bona fide licence to operate.

Judge Brennan said that he did not operate under the man’s Dail Eireann Sovereign Constitution he operated under the constitution of the country. (which country Is that I wondered). That’s grand said the man I’ll have it under the Sovereign Constitution of 1919 as is my right, Is this not the Sovereign Republic of Eire. He got no reply from the Judge who said your having this under the 37 to which the man said No 1919.

Now if you remember Judge Brennan earlier said at their first encounter this man was indeed entitled to have his case heard under the 1919 sovereign constitution and had accepted signed and sealed legal valid bona fide paperwork from the man on 3 occasion’s.  One could be thinking they don’t have a legal valid bona fide licence to operate.

Judge Brennan confabbed with the the garda and they decided they would come back in 2 weeks. The man was told he was obligated to make an appearance, where the man again explained to the judge that he can’t make orders cos he doesn’t have Jurisdiction. Again the Judge threatened to have him removed and when the garda uniforms started circulating the man took his leave under duress.

On this man’s 5th  special appearance to Drogheda District Court, when he arrived at the court a plain clothes garda tried to serve the man with some sort of additional charge sheets. I heard the man ask the garda who he was and when he identified himself he was reminded and held to his oath of office. Its interesting that a garda throwing pieces of paper on a seat near a man walking around could be considered serving someone a summons, but later on in court that’s what the garda claimed he did.

Anyway court commenced it was a lady Judge today I didn’t catch her name. The man’s case was called and he stood up and said he was the man and he was here to present me the man now. He gave the lady Judge his signed and sealed paperwork he had served the garda earlier. He said he wanted his case heard under the 1919 Sovereign Constitution as was his right and that he would be requiring the courts legal valid bona fide licence to operate. Now I seen something I have not seen EVER anywhere not even in YOU TUBE video recordings. ( The videos of people in courts asking Judges for their oaths and licences) The Judge offered the man her WARRANT of appointment. But a warrant is not a licence and the man asked again for the legal valid bona fide licence to operate, again the WARRANT was offered and ignored because it wasn’t a licence. Back to the Mister Tactics for the lady Judge, where she was informed that the man does not have a title and he is not a MISTER. So off the Judge went to have a private conflab with the garda. who said he had served the man two new charges today and wanted to move to the next stage. The Judge asked the garda what the man said when served, the garda said he asked if it was civil or criminal. So no more talking about these charges or they might have to answer a difficult question or two after the Court produces its legal valid bona fide licence to operate. So back to the man to try contract him But the man just asked for the legal valid bona fide operating licence again. So the judge told the man to come back in April again he told her she can’t make orders because she hasn’t got jurisdiction as she didn’t produce her licence. She said she had dealt with him and would have him removed and yet again the garda prepared to circulate when the man said I will accept your offer on condition the court provide me with a legal valid bona fide licence to operate and my case is heard under the 1919 sovereign constitution and left the court.

 

 

 

 

Share This:


  • 0

Gun wielding terrorists break into Meath dwelling, terrorising the occupants.

Category : Latest News , Law , Sovereignty

 

On Wednesday night under the cover of darkness on the 7th of December an armed gang of what can only be described as unidentified terrorists broke into a dwelling in Mornington County Meath. Smashing through 3 doors simultaneously these armed men in black, wielding military style automatic weapons assaulted and threatened 3 surprised men (knocking one on continuous) and pointing these weapons inches from their heads, When asked to identify themselves these strangers remained silent. The owner of the dwelling asked on several occasions for these strangers to identify themselves and when the owner asked ARE YOU HERE TO SHOOT US a live bullet was dropped at his head. Again the owner asked ARE YOU HERE TO SHOOT US and asked these armed strangers if they were the same men wanted in connection with the Regency Hotel shooting as they fitted the description perfectly. This assault continued for some time before a man in plain clothes stepped forward identifying himself as a Garda, No lawful warrant was presented or given for this unlawful occupation of a mans dwelling.

 

Share This:


  • 1

WHY THE STATE HAS NO JURISDICTION OR LEGITIMACY

By Tom Ryan

Definition of STATE: The political system consisting of a body of people who are politically organized, the system of rules by which jurisdiction and authority are organized over such a body of people.
Is that you? Are you an employee of the state? Are you politically organized? Are you a politician?
If you are not one of those, they ‘the state’ try to rope you in by getting us to enter into and agree to a ‘social contract’.

What is a ‘social contract’? “ A social contract is the express or implied agreement between ‘citizens’ and the government by which individuals agree to surrender certain freedoms in exchange for mutual protection.” This is the agreement forming the basis of what a political society is. The political society is the state. The people of the state are politically organized. They have a system of rules by which their jurisdiction is exercised over themselves because they are an institution of ‘self government’.

The Irish Free State was set up by the British Government of Ireland Act on December 1922, replacing the Irish Republic which had been created by Dáil Éireann on January 21st 1919 by the will of the people following the 1918 general election. The social contract was broken right there.
You may have heard that you have ‘civil rights’. There are even ‘civil rights’ movements. Civil rights come from being a ‘citizen’. So what specifically is a ‘citizen? A ‘citizen’ is a member of a political community owing allegiance to the community and being entitled to all its ‘civil rights’.

They took all your unalienable sovereign rights and freedoms in the ‘social contract’ and gave you ‘civil rights’ and ‘protections’ instead.
The state says it has no obligation to protect us. For example it imposed the debt of private banks on the people without any reference to the people. The state robbed you, your children and the unborn children of this country for generations to come. Therefore we don’t have a valid social contract.

We are expected to give up our unalienable freedoms in exchange for protection by the state but they give us no protection. On the contrary they rob us and sell our oil, gas, mineral and fishery rights as well as trying to package our rights to water into a private ‘for sale’ corporation.

Therefore what the state claims to be a ‘social contract’ is now a void contract. It has no standing because there is no protection and no consideration. That in turn means that the political society or community no longer exists in its true meaning. The contract with the people has been broken which means that the state on which it is based can no longer legitimately exist. Therefore the state is a complete fiction.
Since it no longer has even the semblance of legitimacy the state keeps itself together by naked force as is evidenced by the unlawful evictions of people from their homes at the behest of the bankers with the connivance of the judiciary. The treatment of water protesters is another example. You are ruled by a totalitarian junta masquerading as a legitimate government.

Share This: