Drogheda District Court, Man wants his case heard under the 1919 Sovereign Constitution asks Court to produce its legal valid bona fide licence to operate.

Drogheda District Court, Man wants his case heard under the 1919 Sovereign Constitution asks Court to produce its legal valid bona fide licence to operate.

Ive been following a particular incident that took place last December in Mornington Co Meath where armed masked men dressed in balaclavas and full attack gear smashed their way into a private dwelling, assaulted three occupants knocking one out cold for several minutes.

Anyway these masked armed strangers later claimed to be Garda Siochana (guardians of the peace).

When did we the people extend an Garda Siochana the right to bear arms against us?

An Garda Siochana swear and oath to protect us and uphold the constitution. Nowhere does it say an Garda Siochana can use guns against the people.

Anyway one man was detained taken to Navan Garda Station and then Trim circuit court where he asked the Judge a very simple question was this a civil or criminal matter. The Judge refused to answer that question and the man was remanded to Cloverhill prison for a week. One week later he took bail under duress from Cloverhill prison and agreed to make an appearance in Drogheda District court just before Christmas.

One this day the man made his special appearance before Judge Flan Brennan and this is where the case starts to get really interesting. The man stood up and identified himself as a man and told Judge Brennen he was here to present me the man now. He served Judge Brennan with notice that he was here to have his case heard under the 1919 Sovereign constitution as was his right. Judge Brennan agreed he was indeed entitled to this and accepted the signed and sealed paperwork from the man. He asked the man if he would come back after Christmas and have this heard, to which the man replied I will accept your offer if this case is going to heard under the 1919 sovereign constitution and the man left the court.

When this man made his special appearance again after Christmas in the court it was a different lady Judge. Anyway when the man’s case was called he gave the Garda on duty a copy of the paperwork the Judge had received. Again the man said he was there to present me the man now and to have his case heard under the 1919 Sovereign Constitution as is his right. The Judge addressed the man as a Mr to which the man replied no titles or Mr here, I am a man and I present me. Not many people know this but all businesses need a Licence to operate, The court is a business and it needs to have a lawful or legal valid bona fide licence to operate. The man asked the judge if she could provide this licence, She told the man the Garda will have it the next day and put the case off for a few more weeks, saying come back then.

So the man arrives back the next time its now February remember no charges yet still waiting on the DPP to give a file. The case is called the man stand up and tells Judge Flan Brennan that he is here to present me the man now. He gives the Judge his signed and sealed paperwork, Judge Brennan accepts it running his finger over the seal on the paper. He proceeds to call the man by Mr to which the man says Im not a Mr I have no titles I am a man and I present me. The man then asks Judge Brennan can he see his lawful licence, The Judge replies he is not obligated to show anything. The man asks the Judge is this a Sovereign Dail Eireann court or is it a British Accredited Registry court.  The Judge replies this is a lawful court. The man replies if this is a lawful court it will have a lawful operating licence. Judge left speechless. The man was not moving on until the court produce its licence. It appeared the Judge then took it upon himself to set up a hearing between himself and the Garda, at no time was the man party to these arrangements and back in two weeks. The man told the Judge he couldn’t make any orders because he did not have jurisdiction because he hadn’t produced his lawful licence to operate. The man told the Judge he would return if the court will have its lawful operating licence. It appeared to me the Judge was going to hold the man in contempt but later said he would have him removed. Several garda uniforms gathered around the man so he told the Judge I will take my leave now under duress. A different story about what happened that day later appeared in the local newspapers 2 weeks later.

Anyway two weeks later the man makes another special appearance in Drogheda District court, On this occasion a plain clothes lad who accompanied the armed gang who smashed into the man’s dwelling was at court that day, asking the Judge for some sort of adjournment saying the DPP needed two more weeks. Strange there’s no file from the DPP and the newspapers are writing about a man being charged with the cultivation of cannabis without a licence. So the case is called and the man stands up and lets Judge Flan Brennan know he is here to present me the man now. This time he serves the Garda and the Judge with his signed and sealed paperwork and this time he hits the nail on the head. He tells the court he wants this case heard under the 1919 Sovereign Constitution and he required to see the courts legal valid bona fide licence to operate. Again the Mister Title tactics were employed by Judge Brennan to which the man replied I am a man and have no titles all you require is there. He motioned to the signed and sealed paperwork he had handed Judge Brennan earlier. He asked if the court could produce a legal valid bona fide licence to operate.

Judge Brennan said that he did not operate under the man’s Dail Eireann Sovereign Constitution he operated under the constitution of the country. (which country Is that I wondered). That’s grand said the man I’ll have it under the Sovereign Constitution of 1919 as is my right, Is this not the Sovereign Republic of Eire. He got no reply from the Judge who said your having this under the 37 to which the man said No 1919.

Now if you remember Judge Brennan earlier said at their first encounter this man was indeed entitled to have his case heard under the 1919 sovereign constitution and had accepted signed and sealed legal valid bona fide paperwork from the man on 3 occasion’s.  One could be thinking they don’t have a legal valid bona fide licence to operate.

Judge Brennan confabbed with the the garda and they decided they would come back in 2 weeks. The man was told he was obligated to make an appearance, where the man again explained to the judge that he can’t make orders cos he doesn’t have Jurisdiction. Again the Judge threatened to have him removed and when the garda uniforms started circulating the man took his leave under duress.

On this man’s 5th  special appearance to Drogheda District Court, when he arrived at the court a plain clothes garda tried to serve the man with some sort of additional charge sheets. I heard the man ask the garda who he was and when he identified himself he was reminded and held to his oath of office. Its interesting that a garda throwing pieces of paper on a seat near a man walking around could be considered serving someone a summons, but later on in court that’s what the garda claimed he did.

Anyway court commenced it was a lady Judge today I didn’t catch her name. The man’s case was called and he stood up and said he was the man and he was here to present me the man now. He gave the lady Judge his signed and sealed paperwork he had served the garda earlier. He said he wanted his case heard under the 1919 Sovereign Constitution as was his right and that he would be requiring the courts legal valid bona fide licence to operate. Now I seen something I have not seen EVER anywhere not even in YOU TUBE video recordings. ( The videos of people in courts asking Judges for their oaths and licences) The Judge offered the man her WARRANT of appointment. But a warrant is not a licence and the man asked again for the legal valid bona fide licence to operate, again the WARRANT was offered and ignored because it wasn’t a licence. Back to the Mister Tactics for the lady Judge, where she was informed that the man does not have a title and he is not a MISTER. So off the Judge went to have a private conflab with the garda. who said he had served the man two new charges today and wanted to move to the next stage. The Judge asked the garda what the man said when served, the garda said he asked if it was civil or criminal. So no more talking about these charges or they might have to answer a difficult question or two after the Court produces its legal valid bona fide licence to operate. So back to the man to try contract him But the man just asked for the legal valid bona fide operating licence again. So the judge told the man to come back in April again he told her she can’t make orders because she hasn’t got jurisdiction as she didn’t produce her licence. She said she had dealt with him and would have him removed and yet again the garda prepared to circulate when the man said I will accept your offer on condition the court provide me with a legal valid bona fide licence to operate and my case is heard under the 1919 sovereign constitution and left the court.





Share This:


Mark Finnegan

February 25, 2017 at 8:41 am

Well done the man. They are lies and theifs


February 25, 2017 at 12:35 pm

Why didn’t Paul say in the beginning that he would “he would accept her/the courts offer on condition the court provide him with a legal valid bona fide licence to operate and his case heard under the 1919 sovereign constitution”. Did he only think of saying it on his 5th appearance? Any more news on that case?


    February 25, 2017 at 11:20 pm

    No, the first case he was told he was entitled, the second case Judge said the garda would have it next time. Then he was told by judge he wasnt obligated and didnt answer the question about the Dail Eireann Court or British Accerdited Registry court, The man had asked for a lawful licence, fourth occasion he asked for legal valid bona fide licence and had to leave under duress, Last time who made who the offer ?

    Maurice Heaphy

    February 26, 2017 at 12:21 pm

    He Did say it at the start Noel, go back and read it again!


    May 3, 2017 at 8:07 pm

    He said it on every occasion not just the 5th, One should not refuse an offer but SHOULD counter offer instead.


February 25, 2017 at 6:00 pm

Priceless we should all take a leaf out of his book and not accept what is thrown at us without question


February 26, 2017 at 1:58 pm

Power to the people…✌🏼

John Mitchell

February 26, 2017 at 2:51 pm

Is there any chance I could get this Man’s contact info please, or if necessary I could contact the Adm
I will leave my number and email address in the space below.
Regards John Mitchell.


    February 27, 2017 at 4:27 pm

    Yes it is possible


      February 28, 2017 at 11:45 am

      I’d like more information on this as well please

Been there

February 26, 2017 at 3:54 pm

If he signed anything he’s fucked.

Terry Fowler

February 27, 2017 at 10:37 am

Hi is it possible to contact the man
My email is. Rov13 @ live.com
Kind regards Terry Fowler


    February 27, 2017 at 4:27 pm

    Yes it is possible

Paddy Ryan

March 5, 2017 at 6:44 am

This is very interesting. A while ago (2012/2013) a friend of mine was doing some research and came across the different constitutions, the first one and then the amended one. She couldn’t get her head around it or find an online version of the original, so she took to social media and started asking questions … after a while she received a message telling her that now was not the time to be asking those questions and that it might be better for her if she dropped it. So she took the advise and dropped it, removed the questions but kept searching. Today there are links and video’s all over the place as people are beginning to wake up to what happened in Dev’s constitution, you know the one where he took himself and some members of the Catholic church into a room, hashed out the changes while refusing to allow anyone else inside and then went on to produce and implement the 1937 Constitution.
Thought I’d add that here before I asked a question.
And my question is this. How would a person take another to the 1919 court of Irish Law?
If an Irish citizen wanted to apply the law, under the 1919 Constitution, how would they go about it? Are there any Judges to oversee the decisions? Are there any legal people who are aware enough of the 1919 Constitution that they could sanctify and insure that appropriate redress would be made?
If the answer is ‘yes’ or even if we could say ‘that could happen’ then that would open up opportunities to take political representatives to court for failure to apply the promises that they were elected on, or even failure to ‘put the people first’ in their decision making.
It would/could balance out the ‘state of play’ and go some way in the reformation of Eire.
or maybe I’m just chasing Easter rabbits down a wormhole


    May 3, 2017 at 8:15 pm

    The Sovereign courts are in McKee Barracks, One needs to ask for them or you’ll be sent to a BAR court. As far as I know Susan Denaham is appointed to the office of the Sovereign courts.


March 15, 2017 at 8:47 pm

What was the outcome or is this still being dragged out. I’d love to know.


March 28, 2017 at 1:14 pm

Load of balls 😂


March 28, 2017 at 10:47 pm

Would really like to contact this man if this was okay with him…..

Patrick Joseph O’Toole

April 6, 2017 at 11:36 am

The BAR Judges are very well aware that the 1919 Constitution is the True Constitution of Ireland Rathified by all of the Irish People of the 32 Counties , It takes a Referendum to change this and that has NEVER happened and remains the Supreme law of Ireland . The BAR Judges know this and will do as it is shown here ANYTHING and that includes breaking their OWN — OATH OF OFFICE — to stay on the gravy train as that is what the BAR Court system is all about .Money and more Money and is the most corrupt system possible put in place to commit fraud .


April 6, 2017 at 3:38 pm

That man is a HERO and has my utmost respect

UPDATE ON : a man, a Sovereign Constitution, Drogheda District Court, a legal valid bona fide license – Coup d'Etat Media

April 8, 2017 at 2:00 pm

[…] Drogheda District Court, Man wants his case heard under the 1919 Sovereign Constitution asks Court t… […]

Tony Branigan

April 14, 2017 at 2:43 am

This is incredible stuff. I’ve been tuning into Paul’s radio podcast for the last couple of months (living in Australia) and I’ve been following this with a lot of interest.

Apart from the clear denial to cooperate with the man, the way that the court is allowed to treat a citizen of Ireland is just incredible. And that a public newspaper is allowed to fabricate stories is also unbelievable. I believe the man referred to in the newspaper has a solid case for defamation.

Regardless of whether the man is guilty of any crime or not he should at the very least be treated as an innocent and free citizen until proved guilty. The court should be 100% obligated to provide answers to any questions and copies of any documents requested by any citizen of Ireland. As a public service they are there to serve the public, not harass it.

Good on the man for fighting the courts in this way.

If the court is illegal I’ll be very interested to have all the fines that I was subjected to over the years returned in full and with interest to me,

Keep up the good fight!

Chris Fogarty

May 24, 2017 at 12:12 am

Will Ireland actually free itself by reestablishing government of, by, and for, the people – its true Dáil Éireann? That legitimate government, established on January 21, 1919 by the winners of Ireland’s island-wide election of 1918, was immediately attacked by British forces. King George V declared it an “illegal assembly” and imposed his own Royal Irish Dail on December 6, 1921. All subsequent Dails were and are successors to George Vth’s Royal Dail.
This explains why Ireland’s government always operates for Britain’s benefit and against its own people.


June 9, 2017 at 8:20 pm

full respect to this guy and would love to chat wiht him to find out more as onlh today i was discussing the issue of refusal to give civil courts jurisdiction over us!



July 11, 2017 at 11:45 pm

read the constitution, please do not argue with me. For this is factual, no bullshit here.
We have and we are letting a lot of people down.

Man (i am that which i am) called seosamh padraig o duinn

September 21, 2017 at 12:51 pm

One must accept that all charges requiring appearence in a BAR court are construed to be criminal offences elsewise that court has no authority to adjudicate between the parties in dispute.
To identify oneself as a citizen is to give authority to the courts.
The man (male or female) should Identify mans nature as ” i am not a name i am that which i am a living man” and ask the person who would be judge who are you and what do you see before you.
The name of this island is EIRE in 1949 the then government suplimented the name Eire and declared the name of this island to be the Republis Of Ireland and subjected all who live in this land to be citizens (slaves) ot that Republic the members of the State use every device they can to ensure that every man living in this land have a criminal record by action or by declaration of intent – applying for a licence or pasport etc.
Why did the man not ask thejperson acting as judge to identify their nature -is it a living man (male or female) or is it a person ?
Then he could ask for evidence of jurisdiction over living man without consent of the living man. ” statute and legistlation are not law but may be used as law for those who accept them as law”
Just because a man’s nativity occurs in a given location in this planet does not mean that the man is or can be subjecated to any authority against the man’s will save by the will of the man or by the use of force.
There is no common law so to be free a man must make a declaration are you willing to do that?

Leave a Reply